Goal: Students learn about geologic sequestration as a technique used to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Objectives: Students will:
- Understand geologic sequestration as an idea being considered to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
- Use chemistry to simulate oil mining
Materials Needed (per lab group):
- 100 ml of vinegar
- 2 -- #6, two-hole rubber stopper with plastic tubes
- 2 -- 250-ml flask
- 2 lengths of rubber tubing, 45 cm long each
- Safety glasses for each student
- 2 -- 250 ml beaker
- 1 -- 30 ml syringe (no needle)
- Supply of water
- Yellow food color to represent oil
- Box of baking soda
- Several straws or rigid plastic tubing
- Student Response Sheet for each student
Time: 45 minutes
Standards Met: M1, M12, M13, S1, S2, S3, S7
Procedure:
PREP
- Prepare 10 lab stations each with the materials listed above
- Photocopy Geo Sequestration Lab Procedure and Student Sheet.
- Review the teacher sheet and familiarize yourself with Geo sequestration.
IN CLASS
- Explain that students will conduct an experiment to learn about the method of geo carbon sequestration.
- Divide students into groups of 3. They should then move to a lab station with the appropriate materials needed to complete the lab.
- Hand out geo Sequestration Lab Procedure. Review.
- Allow students to conduct the lab while you roam the room and help.
- When students have completed the lab, ask them to clean their lab materials and station so that the next class can use the materials.
- Hand out Geo Sequestration-Student Sheet.
- Discuss experiment results using the student sheet as a guide.
Teacher Sheet
Introduction and Teacher Background: Carbon dioxide sequestration in geo formations includes oil and gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams, and deep saline reservoirs.
Oil and Gas Reservoirs. In some cases, production from an oil reservoir can be enhanced by pumping CO2 gas into the reservoir to push out the product, which is called enhanced oil recovery (EOR). This can also be done in natural gas reservoirs, in which case the process is called enhanced gas recovery (EGR). The United States is the world leader in enhanced oil recovery technology, using about 32 million tons of CO2 per year for this purpose. From the perspective of the sequestration program, enhanced oil recovery represents an opportunity to sequester carbon at low net cost, due to the revenues from recovered oil and gas. In an enhanced oil recovery application, the integrity of the CO2 that remains in the reservoir is well understood and very high, as long as the original pressure of the reservoir is not exceeded. The scope of this EOR application is currently economically limited to point sources of CO2 emissions that are near an oil or natural gas reservoir.
Coal Bed Methane. Coal beds typically contain large amounts of methane-rich gas that is absorbed onto the surface of the coal. The current practice for recovering coal bed methane is to depressurize the bed, usually by pumping water out of the reservoir. An alternative approach is to inject carbon dioxide gas into the bed. Tests have shown that CO2 is roughly twice as absorbing on coal as methane, giving it the potential to efficiently displace methane and remain sequestered in the bed. CO2 recovery of coal bed methane has been demonstrated in limited field tests, but much more work is necessary to understand and optimize the process.
Similar to the by-product value gained from enhanced oil recovery, the recovered methane provides a value-added revenue stream to the carbon sequestration process, creating a low net cost option. The U.S. coal resources are estimated at 6 trillion tons, and 90 percent of it is currently unmineable due to seam thickness, depth, and structural integrity. Another promising aspect of CO2 sequestration in coal beds is that many of the large unmineable coal seams are near electricity generating facilities that are large point sources of CO2 gas. Thus, limited pipeline transport of CO2 gas would be required. Integration of coal bed methane with a coal-fired electricity generating system can provide an option for additional power generation with low emissions.
Saline Formations. Sequestration of CO2 in deep saline formations does not produce value-added by-products, but it has other advantages. First, the estimated carbon storage capacity of saline formations in the United States is large, making them a viable long-term solution. It has been estimated that deep saline formations in the United States could potentially store up to 500 billion tonnes of CO2.
Second, most existing large CO2 point sources are within easy access to a saline formation injection point, and therefore sequestration in saline formations is compatible with a strategy of transforming large portions of the existing U.S. energy and industrial assets to near-zero carbon emissions via low-cost carbon sequestration retrofits.
Assuring the environmental acceptability and safety of CO2 storage in saline formations is a key component of this program element. Determining that CO2 will not escape from formations and either migrate up to the earth’s surface or contaminate drinking water supplies is a key aspect of sequestration research. Although much work is needed to better understand and characterize sequestration of CO2 in deep saline formations, a significant baseline of information and experience exists. For example, as part of enhanced oil recovery operations, the oil industry routinely injects brines from the recovered oil into saline reservoirs, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has permitted some hazardous waste disposal sites that inject liquid wastes into deep saline formations.
The Norwegian oil company, Statoil, is injecting approximately one million tonnes (metric tons, or 1000kg) per year of recovered CO2 into the Utsira Sand, a saline formation under the sea associated with the Sleipner West Heimdel gas reservoir. The amount being sequestered is equivalent to the output of a 150-megawatt coal-fired power plant. This is the only commercial CO2 geo sequestration facility in the world.
FOR THIS LAB:
Review diagram 1. This is the set-up students should have to ensure a successful lab. |